Search for: "State v. Flowers"
Results 401 - 420
of 841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 9:23 am
The case is entitled Soares et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:36 pm
The court relied primarily on the same case cited by the state-court decision last month: ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:36 pm
The court relied primarily on the same case cited by the state-court decision last month: ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:16 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that in Flowers v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
On Wednesday 1st December, the Court will hand down judgment in Fratila and another v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 5:25 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 27/4/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th… [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:58 am
Flowers , 330 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
Mogull v. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
Sunday napTrade marks Banksy’s trade mark, depicting the “Flower thrower”, has been declared invalid due to bad faith by the EUIPO. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 5:00 pm
R (on the application of Majera (formerly SM (Rwanda)) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department – heard 10th May 2021. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:36 am
The options were open to the Justices either to grant review of the case – Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
