Search for: "State v. General Development Corp." Results 401 - 420 of 3,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
Past OFAC designations under this regime include high-profile cyber actors such as the Lazarus Group, for its devastating WannaCry 2.0 ransomware, and Evil Corp, for its costly Dridex malware. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 8:54 am by INFORRM
New Zealand In the case of Peters v Attorney-General sued on behalf of Ministry of Social Development [2021] NZCA 355 the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against a decision rejecting his privacy claims. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Kristian Soltes
This year, Wyoming became the first state to legally recognize decentralized autonomous organizations, or DAOs, as a new form of LLC. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
’[8] As Justice Allsop observed in Incitec v Alkimos Shipping Corp, ‘the question is one of the exercise of a discretion in all the circumstances, but recognising that the starting point is the fact that the parties have agreed to litigate elsewhere, and should, absent some strong countervailing circumstances, be held to their bargain. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Mezrahi is cofounder and CEO, Sigrist is VP of data science, and Doherty is VP of business development at SAR. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Dutch-speaking Enterprise Court of Brussel, 9 April 2020 and 25 February 2021, MSD Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Attorney for the District of Columbia and general counsel for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
  In the majority opinion in Cedar Point, Chief Justice Roberts noted that “this Court has generally applied the flexible test developed in Penn Central” to determine “whether a use restriction effects a taking. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
  In the majority opinion in Cedar Point, Chief Justice Roberts noted that “this Court has generally applied the flexible test developed in Penn Central” to determine “whether a use restriction effects a taking. [read post]