Search for: "State v. Glen" Results 401 - 420 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/wVssl2 (Jim Eidelman) Privilege Or Work Product Waivers - bit.ly/xENsqj (Federal Evidence Review) Resolution on 'Pippins' Discovery Nears, Though Debate Continues - bit.ly/zTrmUQ (Evan Koblentz) Review Website Ordered to Close after Defaming and Harassing Lawyers - bit.ly/tV21Ex (Pinsent Masons) Singapore eDiscovery Case Update: Surface Stone Pte Ltd v Tay Seng Leon and Another [2011] SGHC 223 - bit.ly/AcLYYc (Serena Lim) Social Media Gotchas in Court - bit.ly/AlNxmG (Eric… [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Zoe Tillman
” On appeal, attorneys for the three men argued that prosecutors failed to turn over information on Terry’s drug use the day before she was shot as soon as they found out about it, in violation of Brady v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tim Martin Interiors Ltd v Akin Gump LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 1574 (21 December 2011) Padden v Bevan Ashford Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 1616 (21 December 2011) Kinnear v Whittaker [2011] EWCA Civ 1609 (21 December 2011) Q (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1610 (21 December 2011) Delaney v Pickett & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 (21 December 2011) Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Ltd (t/a Galliford Try Rail) [2011] EWCA… [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am by Victoria VanBuren
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:32 am by Victoria VanBuren
Mattel (Jun. 9, 2008) Rau Gives Souter a C-minus (Jun. 5, 2008) Glen Wilkerson on Hall Street v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]