Search for: "State v. Hollywood"
Results 401 - 420
of 896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:18 pm
First chronologically, the City of Los Angeles, owner and operator of Los Angeles International Airport (“LAX”), brought suit in December 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging a southerly shift in flight tracks of departing aircraft from Bob Hope (Hollywood-Burbank) Airport, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm
On the same day Warby j heard applications in Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell and in Stunt v Associated Newspapers and the case of Morgan v Times Newspapers was mentioned before Soole J. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:47 am
The L-Man Goes to Hollywood. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:50 am
* Capitol Records LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
In United National Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, May 12, 2008 Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:04 am
A California appellate court addressed somewhat similar questions with regard to an injury during a big-budget Hollywood film shoot in Barry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
In Roth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
Scott v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Gray v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am
Coverage of and commentary on the April 29 argument in Glossip v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:06 pm
Additional Resources: Baker v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
City of West Hollywood, 45 Cal.4th 116 (2008) (“Save Tara”), and RiverWatch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:54 am
Newman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:14 pm
City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116, 131, quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:41 am
PepsiCo stated that they were now looking forward to defending the case. [read post]
