Search for: "State v. Hopkins"
Results 401 - 420
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 22 to Thursday 23 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
The interests asserted by petitioners cannot be accommodated with that compelling governmental interest, see United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
Hopkins, 244 S.W. 989, 990 (Tex. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
Hopkins, 244 S.W. 989, 990 (Tex. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
Though there is an interesting decision on the legal test of the consultation – procedural unfairness must be such that “there has been a procedural unfairness which materially prejudiced the applicant” (via Hopkins Developments Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] PTSR 1145 ), rather than simply a technical flaw. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
Hopkins’ holding that gender discrimination in Title VII can extend to certain situations where the plaintiff fails to conform to stereotypical gender norms. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 251 (1989). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Hopkins (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that reliance on sex-role stereotyping can be an actionable form of employment discrimination. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:14 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
