Search for: "State v. J. B."
Results 401 - 420
of 6,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 9:30 pm
An example is Ciraolo v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Pond, J. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, in which KAGAN, J., joined. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:20 pm
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
On the same day Saini J began hearing the trial in the case of Packham CBE v Wightman and others. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
Miho Suzuki v Greenberg 2023 NY Slip Op 31289(U) April 21, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159360/2021 Judge: David B. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am
Zumbiel Co., No. 3:10–cv–891–J–37JBT, 2011 WL 4862498, at *3 (M.D. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:16 am
His Honour Judge Hacon handed down judgment in AutoStore v Ocado on 30 March 2023. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
In Mr J Mitchell v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales: Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2023] UKET 1805473/2022, Royal Mail Group applied to strike out the claim that Mr Mitchell’s dismissal had amounted to direct discrimination or harassment related to religion or belief. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
" here)What do these state anti-ESG bills look like? [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
” Such inside information may be divided into two categories: (a) “transaction-specific inside information” and (b) “issuer-specific inside information. [read post]
