Search for: "State v. J. D. J."
Results 401 - 420
of 6,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Pond, J. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
SOTOMAYOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in part, in which KAGAN, J., joined. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm
” There seems to be only one relevant precedent: Televest v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am
Supp. 3d 1116, 1125–26 (D. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
Siegel v Melito & Adolfsen, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 31373(U) April 14, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152781/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Caroline J. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Caroline J. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Katz, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
In the case of Franks v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
" here)What do these state anti-ESG bills look like? [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
J. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
