Search for: "State v. J. Mitchell"
Results 401 - 420
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 5:01 am
Judge Timothy J. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
Ed. 2d 502 (1983) (Stevens, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:01 am
Mar 31, 2009) (NO. 202)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Mitchell J. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
Grant, Judge.Representing Appellant Forbis: Mitchell E. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Mitchell, 187 Va. 781 (1948); and Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
United States Steelworkers of Am., 768 F.2d 180, 188 (7th Cir. 1985).Mitchell H. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
John J. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
(Morales v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Sharfman & Steven J. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
" (Matter of Daben Corp., 469 F Supp 135, 141 [DPR 1979]; see also Stecher v 85th Estates Co., 43 AD3d 732, 743 [1st Dept 2007] [McGuire, J., dissenting]; 2657 East 68th Street Corp. v Bergen Beach Yacht Club, 161 Misc 2d 1031, 1033 [Civ Ct, Kings County 1994].) [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
Johnson (NFP) Michael Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Mitchell Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0301p.06 2008/08/18 Info-Hold Incorporated v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 1:14 pm
J. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
J. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
J. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
FRIEDLANDER, J., dissents with separate opinion. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
State, 969 So.2d 318, 321 (Fla. 2008) ..........................................................12-13 State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The passage in question from Justice John Paul Stevens' dissent that is slightly misquoted in Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion actually states, "Even if the textual and historical arguments on both sides of the issue were evenly balanced, respect for the well-settled views of all of our predecessors on this Court, and for the rule of law itself, see Mitchell v. [read post]
