Search for: "State v. Keith" Results 401 - 420 of 1,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
Keith Whittington argued that impeachment should not be a partisan affair. [read post]
9 May 2017, 8:24 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Double jeopardy — Indictment requires proof of acquitted acts Keith Anderson, appellant, appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City denying his motion to dismiss an indictment against him on the ground of double jeopardy. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:29 am
On appeal the court lowered the sentence for count 2 (making false ID documents) but the sentence for copyright infringement remained unaltered – six months.Secondly, in R v Ross (William Keith) [2012] EWCA Crim 750, 21 February 2012 in the Crown Court at Newcastle Ross, pleaded guilty to one count of distributing/infringing copies of copyright works, contrary to section 107(1)(d)(iv) of the CDPA 1988. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
Thus, where a “living Constitutionalist” might say that the meaning of equal protection evolved between 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, and 1973, when the Supreme Court decided Frontiero v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post about the judgment from the victorious defendant’s solicitor, Keith Mathiesen. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Keith Bennett, election agent to Keith Vaz, has  accepted substantial undisclosed damages from the Telegraph for an allegation that he had misused his status in relation to North Korean visitors to the House of Commons. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]