Search for: "State v. M. L. C." Results 401 - 420 of 2,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
In the NOE, Caltrans asserted that the project was statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Streets & Highways Code section 103 and Public Resources Code sections 21080.5(c) and 21080.9. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:29 pm by Doug Cornelius
I’m not sure what Anti-Money Laundering has to do with the United States military, but Congress included big changes to anti-money laundering law in the National Defense Authorization Act for 2021. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act (“UCLA”) was made available to state legislatures, effectively ending the debate. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:42 am by JR Chaves
Y finalmente, el hito relativo a ir más allá de la motivación formal, del «trágala», sino la exigencia de motivación de fondo y material que resulte razonada y además razonable y congruente con las bases: La fase final de la evolución jurisprudencial la constituye la definición de cuál debe ser el contenido de la motivación para que, cuando sea exigible, pueda ser considerada… [read post]