Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 401 - 420
of 19,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
To mark the 150th Anniversary of the Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
His article also pointed to Cabrera-Alvares v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
In particular the texts of the Trade Mark Directive and the Community Trade Mark Regulation should be rewritten to match what the Court of Justice said they actually meant in eg Case C-292/00 Davidoff v Gofkid [we've all got used to the law now, so it would be a shame to spoil things by changing it -- but hasn't the ECJ's ruling in Davidoff done quite a bit to clutter the register by extending trade mark protection way past that which the law… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:30 am
Search and Seizure Warrantless entry; consent Mark Miller appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant as a third offense. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
See Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 11:16 am
See Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
Schwab v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
R (Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim, but rejected defendant's constitutional challenge to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
Accordingly, even though the express provisions acknowledging Presto’s proprietorship of the mark terminated upon settlement, the court still found that reliance on that state of affairs fell short of “the ethical standards of acceptable commercial behaviour. [read post]
Judge Solis compares false marking to "someone who says, 'I am not married,' when indeed, they are."
22 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
VendEver LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
As examples, the Court stated that the use of the trademark “Penn State” on a protest sign would be a crime under the law, and that the Court’s own use of the marks “Nike” or “Penn State” in its opinion would be prohibited. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 5:44 pm
Weininger v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm
On Friday, September 17, 2010, I had the opportunity to chat with Professor Mark Lemley, who is the William H. [read post]
