Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller" Results 401 - 420 of 776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
”  Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a commercial fisherman can be convicted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s “anti-shredding” provision for ordering that seventy-two undersized fish be thrown overboard, comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist, Jonathan Keim at the National Review Online, and Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smedley v Smedley, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5647426 (C.A.4 (N.C.)) the Smedleys married in 2000 in Germany, where Mark was stationed as a member of the United States Army. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
AIB Group (UK) plc v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors, heard 5 June 2014. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Rembar went on to defend Henry Miller’s Tropic of Cancer, banned in dozens of states and cities, and, building on his successes, represented G.P. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
She systematically mapped the scope of state-based and individual-based protections against espionage, surveillance and data collection (relying in particular on the U.N. [read post]