Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 401 - 420
of 19,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
His article also pointed to Cabrera-Alvares v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:00 am
To mark the 150th Anniversary of the Dred Scott v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
R (Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
" Simonian v. [read post]
Judge Solis compares false marking to "someone who says, 'I am not married,' when indeed, they are."
22 Jun 2011, 5:35 am
VendEver LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:19 pm
Juniper Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 6:36 am
Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Two US academics, Eric Goldman and Jeff Kosseff, have put together an interesting collection of articles on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and, to mark the twentieth anniversary of the pivotal decision in Zeran v AOL – which they describe as “internet law’s most important decision“. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:15 pm
On Friday, September 17, 2010, I had the opportunity to chat with Professor Mark Lemley, who is the William H. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
The court granted in part defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking action for failure to state a claim, but rejected defendant's constitutional challenge to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
As examples, the Court stated that the use of the trademark “Penn State” on a protest sign would be a crime under the law, and that the Court’s own use of the marks “Nike” or “Penn State” in its opinion would be prohibited. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
Accordingly, even though the express provisions acknowledging Presto’s proprietorship of the mark terminated upon settlement, the court still found that reliance on that state of affairs fell short of “the ethical standards of acceptable commercial behaviour. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
Zukerman, Esq. and Mark M. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 8:04 am
That is the Kentucky case raising three issues about the three-drug protocol for execution, now used in 36 states. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am
Mediaquest Communications LLC v Registrar of Trade Marks [2012] FCA 768 At the moment, as a result of Emmett J’s decision, Mr Brailsford is shown as the owner, but (presumably) Mr McInnes’ firm is shown as the address for service. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Law Off. of Mark S. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 5:44 pm
Weininger v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
