Search for: "State v. McCaine" Results 401 - 420 of 588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
The first is that the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 was co-sponsored by Senator John-McCain, subsequently the Republican Party’s choice for President of the United States in the 2008 race, and even Goldberg’s choice, albeit a reluctant one. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:04 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:41 pm
Similar Posts: Obama Promises Stimulus Package - But No Word on Second Stimulus Check Stimulus Package Is Not the Same as Stimulus Check Obama Team Finalizing Stimulus Package: Still No Check McCain v Obama on Tax: Is It Really Just the Lesser of Two Evils? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:47 am by ipandentertainmentlaw
The Court stated “Moreover, Senator McCain has not established that Plaintiff’s claim is barred, as a matter of law, under the fair use doctrine. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
  Could it be better v. worse-organized campaigns in particular states, or a decision by Obama not to spend money in these regions? [read post]