Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 401 - 420
of 61,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 5:11 am
The result in Snyder v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:00 am
A high-profile Nazi-era restitution claim has been making waves since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision on February 3, 2021.[1] Known commonly as the Guelph Treasure or Welfenschatz case, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
CAAF will hear oral argument in a second case on Tuesday, January 24: United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 9:17 am
Another good day for the Fourth Amendment.Rachel Pickering won in State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
In Alleyne v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:03 am
Moreover, the United States Supreme Court had held, in Fong Foo v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 10:40 am
It is not clear whether the State satisfied the court on this issue. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
" (American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:19 am
Perhaps most famously, following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February 2016, the court issued an equally divided decision in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
Not only does Craig rely heavily on Ohio v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
The court robustly rejected this submission and instead stated that Judges should ask the jury to use their own common sense to determine the meaning of the word. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Peck and constitutional development in the Early United States. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 10:20 am
” Papasan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Lady Justice Sharp proceeded to state, at [19] that, when the Court of Appeal comes to consider meaning: “The issue is not whether we would have come to the same or a different conclusion had we been trying the case at first instance. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:05 pm
But it frequently will be true that such an order has deeper meaning, maybe even major consequences. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:50 pm
The Feb. 26, 2007 ruling of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
