Search for: "State v. Mems" Results 401 - 420 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2011, 5:52 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Richard Caputo granted summary judgment in favor of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in the post-Koken bad faith case of Calestini v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:52 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Richard Caputo granted summary judgment in favor of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in the post-Koken bad faith case of Calestini v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Where habeas corpus proceeding is brought pursuant to DRL§ 70, and children resided outside of this State, reference must be made to the UCCJEA to determine if this state has “home state” jurisdiction   In Matter of Kassim v Al-Maliki, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1774145 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:52 pm
In addition to showing that the environment was sufficiently serious, the plain- tiff must show that the harassment was based on mem- bership in a protected class, Cerros v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state that they could not have obtained copies of the April 4, 2012 board meeting minutes because they “would certainly not have been available to the Defendants while they were performing the due diligence at issue” (Defendants’ Mem of Law, p 5). [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
See Brief For United States As Amicus Curiae, Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]