Search for: "State v. Motor" Results 401 - 420 of 7,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 8:16 am by Michael Oykhman
The intent to mislead can be inferred from the evidence (see: R v Evans, 1995 CanLII 16088 (MBCA)). [read post]
In the amicus brief, we urged the Third District to join the other districts in the state and issue an opinion formally adopting the framework for awarding attorney fees set out by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The amended complaint states a cause of action for legal malpractice and the documents submitted do not utterly refute the factual allegations underlying that cause of action (see generally Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
” Enforcement Under the CRA, market surveillance authorities (MSAs), to be designated or created in each EU Member State, have the primary responsibility for enforcement, including through coordinated sweeps of IoT products made available in the EU. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:15 am by Kyle Persaud
See, for example, ,Matter of Severns’ Estate; ,Crump’s Estate v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:03 pm by Michael Oykhman
The case of See R v Landes [1997] SJ 785 (SKQB) stated that the following factors should be considered when determining physical signs of impairment: Erratic or abnormal diving; Blood shot eyes; Watery eyes; Flushed face; Slurred speech; Odour of alcohol; Lethargic; Loss of motor coordination; Increased reaction time; Diminished sensory perceptions; and/or Inappropriate or abusive behaviour. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
The Court stated, “Rather than fetch a ladder, however, the workers climbed to the motor room on an overturned bucket . . . [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:57 am by Evan M. Levow
Supreme Court established a four-part test for evaluating speedy trial claims in 1972’s Barker v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:54 am by Evan M. Levow
In criminal and motor vehicle cases, however, this state still uses the Frye standard, named for a 1923 federal appellate court decision. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:44 am by Michael Oykhman
There are also special categories of theft such as motor vehicle theft under section 333.1(1) of the Code. [read post]