Search for: "State v. Mounts" Results 401 - 420 of 2,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 1:52 pm by mdkeenan
In People v Sykes, the defendant was knocked unconscious after driving her car into a wall. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
  At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Doug Kendall discusses Mount Holly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am by Lawrence Taylor
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration states that each day, around 32 people die in drunk-driving crashes in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
The DCC has helped wipe out numerous state regulations of the Internet, including the baby CDA laws of the late 1990s (see the flagship case, ALA v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Saira Mohamed
The United States Supreme Court already has turned to foreign and international law in its decisions on the death penalty; in the majority opinion in Roper v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
   A rising generation of progressive scholars (including my colleague Niko Bowie) is mounting assaults on the institution of judicial review. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps asserts that the Pennsylvania Republicans calling for Supreme Court intervention into a state court ruling, based on the state constitution, that invalidated the state’s congressional maps as a political gerrymander, are mounting a “partisan assault on the courts [at] the tip of a nationwide spear—Republican efforts to purge and remodel state courts to make sure they follow the party’s line. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:20 am
The right to be compensated was removed by the decision of the House of Lords in 2007, Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Company.The Association of British Insurers has criticised  the Bill stating that it is "fundamentally flawed. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:53 pm by Michael Geist
The Supreme Court of Canada is examining this issue within the context of libel in the Crookes v. [read post]