Search for: "State v. Murray"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 5:29 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
” Murray CJ suggested that if in the course of the hearing of an application for leave it emerges that a ground or relief can or ought to be stated with greater clarity and precision then it is desirable that the order of the High Court granting leave, if leave is granted, specify the ground or relief in such terms. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 8:50 am
Murray v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
United States Supreme Court I am just about out of ways to creatively announce that the United States Supreme Court has once again had a decision issue day come and go without issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:56 pm
Murray Snow of the U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
Texas Rule of Evidence 509(b) provides that There is no physician-patient privilege in criminal proceedings. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:56 pm
The opinion, State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Bachman v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 2:28 am
Summary judgment test The judge started out by repeating the explanation of the summary judgment test/principles set out in Easyair Ltd v Opal [2009] EWHC 339 (Ch), which states that: each claim must have a realistic rather than a fanciful prospect of success; a realistic claim is one that is “more than merely arguable”; and that in reaching its findings, the court must not conduct a “mini-trial”. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d… [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:23 am
On April 29, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided a fairly typical state postconviction capital case in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:50 am
See Murray v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:40 pm
Murray, 70 Ill. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
But he may not.The case is Vincent v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
The France 2 broadcast, filmed by France 2's Palestinian cameraman, Talal Abu Ramah, with Enderlin's voiceover stating that the father and son "are the target of fire from the Israeli positions" and that the son was shot dead, helped to fuel the Second Intifada in September 2000 and became an incendiary icon throughout the Middle East and beyond. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
Murray, on the briefs) [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:45 am
In Faretta v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
In Diamond v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Newman, 14 N.Y.2d 186, 188 (1964); see also Skiff-Murray v Murray, 17 A.D.3d 807, 810 (3d Dep’t 2005) (finding that attorney’s knowledge could be imputed to a client, “regardless of when or how it was obtained unless it was acquired confidentially”). [read post]
