Search for: "State v. Nichols"
Results 401 - 420
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 9:33 am
In the case, Nichols v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:17 am
Nichols, 551 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Andrew, 961 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Nichols: St. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Lewis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
Nichols, 114 So. 431, 434 (Fla. 1927)). [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Today it is recognised across the common law world that a claim for restitution founded on unjust enrichment is founded neither on consent nor on wrongdoing (see for example Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale and Kleinwort Benson v Birmingham City Council). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The Ninth Circuit, for example, in Nichols v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 7:06 pm
United States, 446 U.S. 156, 176–77 (1980); Gaston Cty. v. [read post]
