Search for: "State v. Nichols"
Results 401 - 420
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in the comic book… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
(Of course, that’s at least partially because we’ve had a strong tradition of free markets in media ever since we revolted against the Brits and mercantilism, their system of state-directed economic planning!) [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:46 am
Nichols Middle School (NMS) has a dress code with a preface stating, “clothing … that causes distractions and inhibits learning is not allowed. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm
The concept of eminent domain came to the forefront in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:05 am
Don Nichols, D2011-0086 (WIPO March 31, 2011). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 9:33 am
In the case, Nichols v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm
” A class of plaintiffs filed Nichols v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:17 am
Nichols, 551 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Andrew, 961 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Nichols: St. [read post]
