Search for: "State v. Owings" Results 401 - 420 of 9,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling, arguably creating tension with the Seventh Circuit’s 2022 decision in Seafarers Pension Plan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like - the speech of end-users. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:01 am
But a letter required by the state that includes a smiley face nonetheless is not an attempt to collect a debt under federal law, and in any event, is more protective than federal law anyway, so is not preempted.In short, I agree with Judge Fletcher. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee terminated at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic In Tan v Stostac Inc., the employee began working as a “container controller” for the employer on June 1, 2015. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee terminated at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic In Tan v Stostac Inc., the employee began working as a “container controller” for the employer on June 1, 2015. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
The part state-owned companies Hikvision and Dahua have been criticised for their links with privacy concerns and human rights abuses in China. [read post]
In Freeport-McMoRan Oil & Gas LLC v. 1776 Energy Partners, LLC, — S.W.3d —, No. 22-0095, 2023 WL 3556695 (Tex. 2023), the Texas Supreme Court held that, as a matter of law, the operator of a joint operating agreement, Ovintiv, did not owe interest on production payments owed to the non-operator, 1776 Energy, that Ovintiv withheld until a separate lawsuit involving 1776 Energy was resolved by the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]