Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 401 - 420
of 29,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
The Court stated that a planning obligation may be entered into in circumstances which are not connected with any planning application, but that it is not lawful to restrict the commencement of development by planning obligation until the developer undertakes to make a financial contribution towards infrastructure which is unconnected with the development of the site. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
(quoting Cole v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:34 am
The argument yesterday morning in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:55 am
Lord Carnwath finished by praising the judgment in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, stating that making the 2008 Act work as intended is in all our interests, and that generous rules of standing are important to provide a mechanism for listening to competing interests in national infrastructure projects. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
The Louisiana Department of Justice plans to appeal directly to the state Supreme Court and has already asked the trial court to suspend its order pending appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:47 pm
Continue reading The post Riverside v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
Bauer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm
The district court temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the two requirements, agreeing with Planned Parenthood that both requirements bore a close resemblance to the Texas rules that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional in 2016, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:47 am
Supreme Court decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 12:47 pm
My analysis of the November argument in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:10 am
In Hile v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:38 am
That was the case in Pierrotti v. [read post]
