Search for: "State v. Powell"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 2:23 pm
By Ekaterina Powell, Esq. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
There's something curious about the United States' position in Munaf v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995); Powell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm
Luis Alberto Zambrana La decisión de Ramos v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:21 pm
State v Casillas. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Powell bars habeas relief if the state fails to [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:55 pm
In the background is a further factor: In May 2001, when the Court passed up a chance to review the issue in a case from a Texas state court (Bridger v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 614, 620-21 (1998) Modifica los elementos de la conducta delictiva por los que una persona fue convicto. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:09 am
" In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
Powell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:27 pm
Powell wrote for the majority 6-3. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
Secretary of State, Colin Powell. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:52 pm
The case is Sutton v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
The opinion draws heavily on Powell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
" * Penal Law §70.30(3) provides convicted individuals with a credit for any incarceration time served prior to conviction so that their sentences will be the same as those imposed upon individuals who were not so detained [Powell v Malcolm, 44 A.D.2d 65, appeal dismissed 34 N.Y.2d 752]. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
" * Penal Law §70.30(3) provides convicted individuals with a credit for any incarceration time served prior to conviction so that their sentences will be the same as those imposed upon individuals who were not so detained [Powell v Malcolm, 44 A.D.2d 65, appeal dismissed 34 N.Y.2d 752]. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am
Powell cast what would seem to have been the deciding vote in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
Note that, with respect to the last question in particular, the fact that this is an appointment to fill a vacancy weakens -- although it does not eliminate -- the concern in Powell v. [read post]
