Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
Happy V-Day, everyone.This feed originates at the personal blog of Scott Lincicome (http://lincicome.blogspot.com). [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:46 am
NTE LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
All sides were too quick. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
Van Stean v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:30 pm
The new Rule 502 became an issue in Center Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm
Some Circuit Courts were quick to act. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 8:23 am
Womack v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:19 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:34 pm
The Denver University Law Review last year allowed me to contribute quick thoughts about the Supreme Court's work in Rita v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:56 am
(See Bostock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:45 pm
A quick Westlaw search (in which I certainly may have missed something) indicates that the last time the Court did so — setting aside cases in which the Court took a case and consolidated it with another one coming from the court of appeals, or simply granted cert to vacate and remand in light of a recent decision — was 23 years ago in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 9:57 am
The decision in Mayo v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Although urinalysis results may often be sufficiently reliable evidence that the opportunity for crossexamination is unnecessary for due process purposes, see United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:30 pm
United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985), that the National Stolen Property Act, 18 U. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 8:19 am
Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
See also M.A. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
UPDATE: I have now posted the opinions, and here’s a quick run-down: (a) Judge Sentelle’s dissent argues that GPS surveillance is directly covered by the Supreme Court’s beeper case, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm
Federalism by Jury in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
The case was Quick v. [read post]
