Search for: "State v. R. V. B." Results 401 - 420 of 15,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 12:33 pm by Michael Oykhman
This was supported in precedent in the decision R v Ramzy 2014 ONCJ 30 (CanLii), where, if a public officer was directed by a supervising public officer [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:10 am by Michael Oykhman
Rather, as indicated in the case of R v Dinardo, [2008] S.C.C, the sexual element of touching can arise from circumstances other than the manner in which the victim was touched. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Andy Biggs (R-AZ) and Pat Fallon (R-TX), has proposed impeaching Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for his role in carrying out Biden’s immigration policies. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am by Giles Peaker
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am by Administrator
Cette distinction entre devoirs et pouvoirs a été consacrée en 1963 au Royaume-Uni dans l’arrêt de principe R. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Good morning and thank you, [Columbia Law School] Dean [Gillian] Lester, for the introduction. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v Wong, 2012 ONCA 432, indicated that this definition equally applies to s. 95 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:53 am by Michael Oykhman
R v Papalia stated that causing bodily harm to the victim is not an essential element of the offence of sexual assault with a weapon. [read post]