Search for: "State v. Rand"
Results 401 - 420
of 479
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 6:00 pm
Accordingly, the court granted in part and denied in part the employer’s petition to deny enforcement of an NLRB order; correspondingly, it denied in part and granted in part the NLRB’s cross-application for enforcement (Dresser-Rand Co. v. [read post]
The Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice Report on Antitrust and Intellectual Property
23 Jul 2007, 10:28 pm
The report discusses various strategies to mitigate hold-up, including the use of disclosure requirements and “reasonable and nondiscriminatory” (RAND) licensing terms. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Shoemaker, University of Wisconsin-Madison, “Sanctuary Law and a Strong Anglo-Saxon State? [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
In the 1996 case of Whren v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
State Farm Gen. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am
The new school of political economy that he created at the University of Virginia was “meant to train a new generation of thinkers to push back against Brown [v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
Rand Paul’s willingness to support Kavanaugh after voicing concerns about the judge’s approach to Fourth Amendment digital privacy issues “suggests that in his private meeting with Kavanaugh, the SCOTUS nominee signaled his willingness to take a new view of the Fourth Amendment in light of [the Supreme Court’s recent decision in] Carpenter [v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 9:01 pm
(In District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
These latter procedures, however, have been constitutionally suspect since the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
The entire system, according to Rand, had to be accepted or rejected. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:17 pm
HotChalk v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
The Vice-Chair stated the importance of the issues, 35. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Rand Paul, M.D., who most certainly should know better. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Two Guantanamo-related cases set dates for oral argument: Al Janko v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:23 pm
Google and, before Google acquired it, Motorola never really liked the Microsoft v. [read post]
