Search for: "State v. Revelle"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
Concurrent with these negotiations, the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) also has been considering a broad challenge to the Safe Harbor in the case of Schrems v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:10 am
" Gannett Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 1:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Geduldig v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am
The closest analogy for Mueller’s decision to charge the Russian trolls is probably the May 2014 indictment in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Is Delaware law as stated in MacRitchie consistent with Dodge v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:30 am
One of those two employees was unsure if the person underneath was a man or a woman, according to the court documents.The case used to illustrate the doctrine in my torts casebook was Yania v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon, United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:33 am
In earlier decisions, the Appellate Division determined that plaintiff stated a cause of action in Judiciary Law 487. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
In Schrems v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:17 pm
According to a slide made public in the Snowden revelations, in 2012, the United States gave almost $500,000 to the Ethiopian government to fund their surveillance efforts—enough money to buy plenty of licenses for the FinFisher software used to spy on our client. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
During the early stages of my legal career, I had the opportunity to work on a tragic case, Khan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In Diop v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Since the Klass and others v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:24 am
The Department of Justice filed a motion yesterday that would block plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
