Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 401 - 420 of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Williams & Ors v Redcard Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 466 (20 April 2011) Berezovsky & Anor v Edmiston & Company Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 431 (19 April 2011) Finurba Corporate Finance Ltd v Sipp SA & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 465 (20 April 2011) Okafor & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 499 (20 April 2011) Vestergaard Frandsen SA ( MVf3 APS) & Ors v Bestnet Europe… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm by Jim Walker
The cruise line never reported the incident to the Alaska State Troopers, or the FBI, or the flag state. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Marnie Baizley and Emily Siu
In light of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Waksdale v Swegon North America, would a contract provision that expressly states that these types of bonuses are not considered to be part of an employee’s “wages” be valid? [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 7:00 am by Marnie Baizley and Emily Siu
In light of the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Waksdale v Swegon North America, would a contract provision that expressly states that these types of bonuses are not considered to be part of an employee’s “wages” be valid? [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am by Giles Peaker
Tapper v Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (unreported, 4 January 2022, County Court at Central London, HHJ Parfitt) This was a section 204 Housing Act 1996 (‘HA 1996’) appeal against a review decision finding that the Appellant was intentionally homeless. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
  First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
That’s right Law Blog readers, an already juicy preemption conflict has just gotten even juicier, and you know there’s almost nothing we like better than a clash between the federal government and one of our fifty states. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
This week saw the publication of the Civil Justice statistics for the Royal Courts of Justice 2016. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]