Search for: "State v. S. C. D." Results 401 - 420 of 13,932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
The need to keep a certain sign free for competitors is not an interest protected under Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR, but rather of other absolute grounds, such as Artt. 7(1)(c), (d) or (e) EUTMR. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
The claim was based on the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (“CCA 1974”), ss 140 A-D, alleging that the failure to disclose commission had rendered the credit relationship between the parties unfair. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
Wearing religious symbols and the CJEU To the surprise of some (though not to us because we’d read the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Collins) on Tuesday, in OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22 the CJEU held that the ban on municipal employees wearing signs or dress indicating their religious or philosophical beliefs imposed by the Commune d’Ans, in Belgium, was not incompatible with their rights under the EU… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm by Kalvis Golde
’” A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Daves v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[and] provide for a hearing and an appeal" (See Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Critical Role did not move for summary judgment as to Monster's Section 43(c) dilution-by-blurring claim but it maintained that the ruling on the Section 2(d) claim rendered the dilution claim moot. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:41 am by Seth Davis
There were, however, oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm by Roos Klomberg
Since then, the Court has specified in a number of cases what the scope of inquiry is for the executing authority when applying this test (See for example Case C-327/18 PPU (RO) and Case C-128/18 (Dorobantu)). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
  It is worth considering if only because it represents, in a general way, much of the thinking that is gaining increasing traction not just among developing states, but also among a certain sector of academic and policy elites in liberal democratic developed states. [read post]