Search for: "State v. Sales" Results 401 - 420 of 20,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am by Raymond McKenzie
  Further, in a recent New York case, Burgers Bar Five Towns, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:13 am by sally
Regina (Sinclair Collis Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWCA Civ 437; [2011] WLR (D) 200 “The prohibition on the sale of tobacco from automatic vending machines was justified on the ground of the protection of public health, was proportionate and therefore did not violate EU law by its adverse effect on the business of the operators of vending machines and suppliers in other EU states. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:08 am by Jeremy
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe: so much name, so little chair ...Our friends in Curia have spared us an English version of Case C-516/13 Dimensione Direct Sales srl, Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA, a Court of Justice of the European Union reference upon which Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalón delivered his Opinion this morning. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:33 am by Steven Boutwell
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued perhaps the most significant and far-reaching decision affecting state sales and use tax collection since its Quill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:45 am by Nancy L. Urizar, Ph.D.
On March 21, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments for the case of Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 am by Ronald Mann
Next Tuesday’s argument in Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The test is the result of 25-year-old Supreme Court ruling in Quill Corp. v. [read post]