Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 401 - 420
of 15,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The… [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:21 pm
The Justices were scheduled to hear on December 4 the case of Mount Holly Township Council v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 5:09 am
Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians to receive judgment funds that settled claims against the United States for the unconscionable taking of tribal lands. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:32 am
Soto v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:14 am
New case - Gallagher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:26 am
And, perhaps more to the point, the question arises how Arizona v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:29 pm
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:41 am
With its opinion yesterday in Mims v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Due to the unforeseen unavailability of a panel member, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to postpone the Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
Corporate law — Stockholders’ agreement — Arbitration clause This case concerns the interpretation of a broadly-worded arbitration clause in a stockholders agreement, which states that “[a]ny and all disputes under this Agreement or involving any of its terms shall be settled by arbitration[.] [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am
In line with his earlier judgment in Hesham Ali (case comment here), Lord Reed rejected the Secretary of State’s submissions that in cases of non-settled migrants, the question is whether the state owed them a positive obligation to grant leave to remain, rather than whether there had been an interference with art 8 which could be justified. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Brand (University of Pittsburgh - School of Law) has posted Treaties and the Separation of Powers in the United States: A Reassessment after Medellin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:35 pm
[law.com; United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:41 pm
In People of the State of New York v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:20 am
Unlike the SCOTUS' 1973 Roe v Wade decision, considered the height of judicial activism, which created a sweeping constitutional ban on anti-abortion legislation, last term's same-sex marriage decision adopted a state-by-state approach.While the momentum toward recognition of same-sex marriage as a civil right has gained steam since we here at the Law Blogger picked-up on the issue back in 2009, it will take at least a quarter century for the current dust to… [read post]
