Search for: "State v. State Board of Finance" Results 401 - 420 of 1,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 23 October, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment of R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm by Jana Grauberger and Stephen Wiegand
Appeals of decommissioning orders: Current regulations – Decommissioning orders that are appealed remain effective unless BSEE agrees to suspend the effectiveness of the order during the appeal period or the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”) grants a stay of the order. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am by Marcia Coyle
Board of Education, ending segregated public schools (1964 election); Miranda v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
Bannon in Matter of Cayne v 510 Park Avenue Corp., the court dismissed Cayne’s petition on the grounds that his “overly broad” demand for records was “supported only by speculation” of mismanagement by the co-op’s board. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
Cydney Posner’s blog provides a good overview of the lawsuit and notes that it’s patterned after the lawsuit challenging California’s board gender diversity law, SB 826: Framed as a “taxpayer suit” much like Crest v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
The head of the Spanish state, King Felipe VI, represents the unity and continuity of the state’s institutions. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  My allegedly forthcoming work maintains that John Bingham was the only Republican who really cared about Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment, Section One adds little to the Thirteenth Amendment, which was understood as an empowerment (are you listening Democrats in Congress) rather than as a constraint (are you listening John Roberts), and that few persons other than Bingham thought the privileges and immunities clause incorporated the Bill of Rights (there goes decisions striking down… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  How Extensive Will the Board Diversity Litigation Phenomenon Turn Out to Be? [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled five (V) oral hearings for the month of September 2020. [read post]