Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 401 - 420
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
by a trader in the course of trade3. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:09 pm
In Silverberg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:21 am
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
Last Friday, in Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch), in what for him is quite a short judgment, Mr Justice Arnold gave the plot away in the very first of his 77 paragraphs:"In what circumstances can a trader secure a perpetual monopoly in the shape of a product by registering it as a trade mark? [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
In Fein v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
There is a likelihood of confusion between the Marks BETPACK and BETDAQ and the registration of a confusingly similar mark is contrary to the provisions of Community Law prohibiting the registration of the Trade Mark in the State, particularly Council Regulations regarding the registration of trade marks. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
State-registered advisers need to examine their state’s rules to determine who constitutes the “client. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
First Derivative Traders, 131 S. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 8:39 am
The style of the case is O'Farrell v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:44 am
” Military Judge James Pohl, who is overseeing the key military commission cases, has set the date for the trial in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:06 pm
If we say you have to work for white slave traders (i.e. a pimp and a possible suspect class), you have to work for white slave traders. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm
., in connection with running a sole trader business). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am
This means that the intended objective will not be achieved and, in certain cases, that consumer protection is sacrificed in favour of traders’ interests. [read post]
