Search for: "State v. Two Bulls"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
While I’ve yet to find any King remarks directly about copyright—I’m certainly not claiming to speak for him or his family—I think two things are clear. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:49 am
• • • A Sirius Setback: Two Courts Reject Motion for Reconsideration was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesNote, though, that Sirius XM had already done the same for the California federal court litigation prior to the New York decision.114 F.2d 86. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
Ideally, the two should be synonymous, but that should not be the starting assumption. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:29 pm
There are two basic options. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Here is the motion to dismiss in Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:34 am
However, as noted above, two courts in California—state and federal—similarly concluded that California state copyright law includes an exclusive right of public performance for sound recording owners. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
United States (Redux). [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm
Thursday, November 13th at 10 am: Finally, we remind you that oral arguments in USA v. al Nashiri will resume on Thursday at 10 am in the U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
There are increasing calls for States and business to step up action, including for States to negotiate a legally binding instrument. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:02 pm
State, 378 N.J. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
The Court will hear appellate arguments in two cases (I have stated below the issue for each; for a fuller treatment, click on the cases): 2:00-2:40 PM: Andy Biggs et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 8:30 am
The Court will hear appellate arguments in two cases (I have stated below the issue for each; for a fuller treatment, click on the cases): 2:00-2:40 PM: Andy Biggs et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
(Note that the hearing will proceed, despite the pendency of the United States’ appeal of the dismissal of charges relating to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in an attack on the M/V Limburg.) [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:25 am
Be sure to catch the follow up, Further Thoughts on Infringement as Conversion, for a discussion about the impact (or lack thereof) of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dowling v United States on the analysis. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
Steven questioned whether there was a solution to this troublesome state of events. [read post]
