Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 401 - 420 of 1,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  So far the business of the Courts in England and Wales continues. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Informational privacy law England and Wales In England and Wales the tort of misuse of private information requires an individual establish a reasonable expectation of privacy (REP) over the relevant information. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
The changes caused substantial harm to the value of the investments of the applicants, which are incorporated in England & Wales, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
The changes caused substantial harm to the value of the investments of the applicants, which are incorporated in England & Wales, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
The changes caused substantial harm to the value of the investments of the applicants, which are incorporated in England & Wales, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
When it comes to the validity of European patents, the national courts of the EPC member states apply the same law as the EPO. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Switzerland Swiss local reports that the Swiss Federal Court has held that clicking “like” on Facebook on hateful content could amount to a crime United States The US has recently tightened regulations over Chinese state media. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:35 am by Beth Kivelä
Both parties entered the agreement in a calm rational state, in good time prior to the wedding. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:19 am
As a reminder, ATR was potentially on the hook for (i) the press release; and (ii) aircraft branding.Unlike easyfly, ATR is domiciled in the EU and, therefore, under Article 125 EUTMR easyGroup had the choice of suing ATR in its Member State of domicile (France) or in the Member State in which the act of infringement occurred (Article 125(5)). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 11:15 am by Unknown
"'Pattern of Discrimination': The United States, Refugees and Barriers to Asylum," University of New South Wales Law Journal Student Series, no. 8 (2020) [full-text]Policies Affecting Asylum Seekers at the Border: The Migrant Protection Protocols, Prompt Asylum Claim Review, Humanitarian Asylum Review Process, Metering, Asylum Transit Ban, and How They Interact (American Immigration Council, Jan. 2020) [text]Use of Video in Place of In-Person Immigration… [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am by INFORRM
I n September 2019, in R (Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales, the High Court ruled that the use of FRT by South Wales Police was, in those specific instances, lawful (the case was brought by Ed Bridges, a member of the public, who believed his image had been captured on FRT from a police van whilst he was shopping in Cardiff city centre). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Section 9 – Action against persons not domiciled in the UK or an EU/Lugano Convention State Section 9 provides that the court will not have jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim where the prospective defendant is resident outside of the UK, European Union, or the Lugano Convention states (Norway, Switzerl [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:31 am
It just a few months ago that this blog reported on the Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev in the Sky v SkyKick, C-371/18 case.important A referral from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales made by Arnold J (as he then was), the Sky case is probably the most important referral in the EU trade mark field made over the past few years. [read post]