Search for: "State v. Wing" Results 401 - 420 of 1,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
All but one of the hearings will be held in the East Wing of the Madison Building, in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
These regulations treat state office digital campaign materials in the same manner as traditional campaign materials and do not put any extra burdens on candidates and their campaigns.In 2011, the judiciary flexed its social media wings in Griffin v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
Many of his positions on church-state matters would normally be taken for quite liberal; for example, he argued the recent Supreme Court case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff’s conclusory allegation that the defendants intended to deceive the court and the plaintiff in relying on the affirmative defense of release in the claim denial action was not sufficient to state a cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d at 698; Kupersmith v Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc., 38 AD3d 847, 848). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:03 am by V.Venkatesan
By Renu GuptaGuest BloggerThis post refers to Supreme Court's decision in State of Uttaranchal v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We had seen this before in some past Confrontation Clause cases, such as Hammon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:13 pm by John Floyd
Connecticut (state ban on contraceptives for married couples declared unconstitutional), and Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Kevin Russell
On Wednesday, January 11, the Court will hear oral argument in Coleman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 1:09 pm
For those West Wing fans amongst you, please watch the 39th episode of West Wing entitled "The Stackhouse Filibuster. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]