Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
United States, the Rehnquist court wrote: In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:28 am
Alabama, 16-9282 Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:42 am
United States of America, decided on May 23. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
That the AEDPA (anti terrorism and effective death penalty act) requires federal courts to give state courts great deference in interpreting the law, and that great deference combined with the fact that the supreme court has never held that a failure to give a closing argument is ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Strickland, I think proponents of Section 5 can be comforted that he is not likely to strike the Act down in the Texas Redistricting Cases (especially given that the question was not adjudicated below, although, of course, that did not stop the Court in Citizens United). [read post]
11 May 2022, 7:19 am
It would have a hard time saying otherwise, since the government itself petitioned for Supreme Court review on this very issue a couple years back in the much-relisted United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
The Florida Supreme Court has held that the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Strickland, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
