Search for: "Sullivan v. State Bar" Results 401 - 420 of 559
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Celebrity LeveragingRobert Raskopf, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP was up after the coffee break discussing the exploitation of celebrity rights in the US. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:28 am by Transplanted Lawyer
The law would seem to support my initial reaction: New York Times v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm by Christopher Mathews
  Barring the unexpected, the trial will end tomorrow. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 5:32 am by Christopher Mathews
Barring the out of the ordinary, presentation of evidence on findings should wrap up this morning. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:36 am by Susan Brenner
Nonetheless, later that evening, [he] drove . . . over the state line to the Slab House bar in Mississippi. . . . [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:13 pm by jak4
Sullivan, “Shareholder Bylaw Proposals, Delaware Certification, and the SEC After CA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
” MCRD SJA LtCol Sean Sullivan states in a declaration (part of Exhibit A here): 11. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:01 am by John Steele
The Wisconsin Lawyer (from the state bar) offers Dean Dietrich's useful summary, with nearly a dozen cites to ethics opinions from various states, about when a lawyer is impliedly authorized to disclose client confidences. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
Sullivan’s actual malice standard by stating alternative theories of tort liability. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm by Anthony Lake
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]