Search for: "Supervisors v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,689
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 8:08 am
Caldera v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In other words, he thought Sure-Tan required the court to reconcile the NLRA and immigration law by excluding from NLRA coverage anyone who could not legally be hired in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
Judge Kavanaugh’s dissent stressed that federal law expressly allows the State Department to contract with American workers in foreign locations without regard to statutory provisions relating to employment contracts in the United States, including the ADEA. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
In the world of television, networks have used the Nielsen rating system, since 1947, to measure audience size and composition of television programming in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 7:34 am
The court also did not act unreasonably by imposing the maximum fine of $500,000, despite the known likelihood that the employer would be unable to pay a substantial fine since it had ceased operations (United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
The District Parole Supervisor justified the ban based not on J.I. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 5:31 am
In Vanderklok v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:10 am
United States Telecom Ass'n v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
United States, 508 U.S. 129, 113 S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:18 am
United States (a 1990 holding that administrative exhaustion is a jurisdictional requirement) can’t be squared with the Supreme Court’s reasoning in its 2006 decision in Arbaughv. [read post]
