Search for: "The Bishop Law Firm" Results 401 - 420 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2013, 11:22 am
She and her personal Chancellor have been so identified with the litigation agenda of ECUSA (because they run that agenda without interference from anyone else in the entire Church) that they are taking a hit, so to speak, on account of the reversals which that agenda has recently suffered in Texas (Fort Worth), Illinois (Quincy), South Carolina, and yes - let it be said -- in San Joaquin (even though there is as yet no final judgment there, ECUSA faces a decidedly uphill battle to convince the… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
After many months, and many media stories about child sex abuse at the Yeshiva University High School (“YUHS”) in The Jewish Daily Forward, Yeshiva University released the “independent investigation” of child abuse that was led by Karen Patton Seymour, Co-Managing Partner of the litigation department of the prestigious law firm Sullivan & Cromwell. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  Father James Connell, one of the brave founding members of the Catholic Whistleblowers, recently brought the definition of “justice” in Section 1807 of the CCC to my attention: Justice is the moral virtue that consists in the constant and firm will to give their due to God and neighbor. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:44 am by Broc Romanek
And here are some recent blogs weighing in: - Keith Bishop's "Advertising Securities With Celebrity Endorsers" - Keith Bishop's "Advertising Securities As Safe - A "No, No" In California" - Keith Bishop's "With General Solicitations Soon To Be Permitted, It's Time To Recall The Commissioner's Advertising Rules" - Steve Quinlivan's "Law Firm Verification of Accredited Investor Status" - Gustav Schmidt's "Removal of ban on general solicitation and… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
They are also available, catalogued a bit differently, on the website of the law firm representing the victims. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:30 pm by Pete Strom
The Strom Law Firm Can Help with DUI Charges If you or a loved one has been charged with DUI, whether first offense or felony DUI, contact a South Carolina DUI Lawyer at the Strom Law Firm, LLC today. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:30 pm by Pete Strom
The Strom Law Firm Can Help with DUI Charges If you or a loved one has been charged with DUI, whether first offense or felony DUI, contact a South Carolina DUI Lawyer at the Strom Law Firm, LLC today. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:51 pm
If you were the victim of Massachusetts sexual abuse, please contact our Boston sexual assault law firm to request your free case assessment. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:39 am by Broc Romanek
DOC Says Don't Forget The Securities Laws - Gary Emanuel's 5 Reasons Why Equity-Based Crowdfunding Under the JOBS Act Won't Work - Washington Post's While waiting for SEC regulations, crowdfunding leaders focus on investor education - CFO.com's Can Mature Firms Benefit from Crowdfunding? [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 7:26 am by Dan Harris
One of my law partners suggested to this investor that he instead use the money to fly himself and my law partner to Vegas (this was before Macao got so big) and put the money on red. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
Federal Election Comm'n (2010) 558 U.S. 310, -, 130 S.Ct. 876, 899, 175 L.Ed.2d 753), general California statutory and common law principles governing transfer of title by the legal title holder, the law of trusts, including establishment of trusts and transfers by a trustee in contravention of a trust upon the property (if a trust is established by the evidence), and corporations law, including the law of corporations sole (see Corp.Code, § 10010) and… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
Having learned nothing from their experience with an identically framed federal lawsuit in Fort Worth, the Presiding Bishop and her Chancellor have now spotted Provisional Bishop Charles vonRosenberg to an ill-advised and futile gambit in the Charleston Division of the Federal District Court in South Carolina.No less than three law firms were engaged (presumably at ECUSA's sole expense) to bring a complaint in that court, based on the federal trademark… [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 11:07 am
("With another victory like this, we should lose not only the war, but perhaps even the country").Similarly, with three separate law firms hired to bring the federal lawsuit against Bishop Lawrence (and Bishop Lawrence only) in South Carolina, one has to wonder what it is about this one man, the Rt. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A couple of examples come to mind: say, for example, when the insured company has spun out one of its divisions as a stand alone, publicly traded entity, and the separate entities file claims not only against the new company but out of the predecessor firm as well. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:13 pm
Given the State court precedents that have already been established, it will not be like any of those that have gone before.As an Episcopalian, my hope is that the Executive Council, before voting to approve a $250,000 credit line for the remnant group in South Carolina, received fully independent advice from a source other than the Presiding Bishop's personal Chancellor, or his law firm. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:15 pm
The litigation which "The Episcopal Church" is using its trust funds to support is all being conducted by the law firm of the Presiding Bishop's chancellor. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:13 am by Doug Cornelius
” SEC Faces A Swarm Of Legal Issues In Considering The Investor Advisory Committee’s Recommendations Concerning General Solicitation by Keith Paul Bishop in California Corporate and Securities Law The SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee held another meeting last week with Elisse B. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Jon Bruno, Bishop Diocesan of the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:26 am by Jeff Lipshaw
 It seems to me the appropriate balance is when I, as GC, say to the Big Law firm - this is about how much I'm willing to pay for the deal, given that I need a mix of high value and low value services, and when the Big Law partner says that I'm going to charge you for the low value stuff to the extent necessary to allow the firm to continue to produce the high value stuff. [read post]