Search for: "The Collector v. Day" Results 401 - 420 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In Bruen, he penned an amicus brief for the Bay Colony Weapons Collectors. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
Such is the high-profile case of an allegedly Nazi looted Modigliani leaked to have been stored in Geneva Freeport.[29]Maestracci v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
(The newspaper's 98-year-old co-owner died the next day of a heart attack.) [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:15 am by V.D.RAO
The statement adverts to the judgment of the Supreme Court inMardiaChemicals Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am by centerforartlaw
Eric Spoutz (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michigan-art-dealer-sentenced-more-3-years-prison-defrauding-collectors-145-million) United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
That was a  change for before, when tax collectors were allowed to confiscate arms from people who could not pay the property tax. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:55 am
As used in this order:(a) "Army Field Manual 2-22.3" means FM 2-22.3, Human Intelligence Collector Operations, issued by the Department of the Army on September 6, 2006. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm by Doorey
 These terms included changes to the rules restricting contracting out  of jobs, so that City could fire garbage collectors and give their jobs to a private sector provider, as Rob Ford had promised. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]