Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Gray" Results 401 - 420 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Sabrina McCubbin summarized Jewel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(GRAY on Claims)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Blocking attorneys from simultaneously litigating and prosecuting patents: In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Patently-O) CAFC: Muscle ad in magazine invalidates patent: Iovate Health Science Inc v Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc (IPKat) (IP Directions) CAFC: If patent troll sends the letter, then a case-or-controversy ‘implicitly’ is asserted: HP v Acceleron (ISinIP) District Court S D Florida… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
These people are the salt of the earth and there is no gray in their lives. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Travel Caddy, Inc (not precedential) (Gray On Claims) (PATracer) (Patently-O) CAFC: Egyptian Goddess clogs up the CAFC: International Seaway Trading Corp. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although I have seen smart people suggest this argument as something one or more Justices might endorse, I have difficulty taking it seriously. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:02 am
Marilyn Stowe looks at the recently published case of Winter v Winter (above). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
It may be interesting to know the proportion of ABA members who represent copyright owners, to those who represent gray market buyers/consumers. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Gray and his coauthors found that the SNAP work requirements reduced participation in the program by about 53 percent, but also found that the requirements had no impact on the number of people working. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
New York dealt with this recently when a federal judge struck down in Alexanxder v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm by Kelly
Biolitec, Inc (Gray on Claims) (Patently-O) CAFC: Successor company holds patents assigned to predecessor company (even if assigned after predecessor dissolved): Tri-Star Electronics Int’l. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm by David Kopel
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
    The claimant has brought 11 defamation claims he had brought against people he claimed had defamed. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The presenters will also explore the disproportionate victimology of the Native American population and how abiding by non-Indian systems of justice fails Native American people.4:45 – 5:00:  Closing [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:20 pm
Shit, both Hudson and De Novo are now only registering people with over a year of coding experience. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]