Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Stack"
Results 401 - 420
of 620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2013, 10:29 am
Today EFF, together with Public Knowledge, filed an amicus brief in Nautilus v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
From the standpoint of a parent the cards are stacked against them from the start (more so when all the work is done pre-proceedings). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm
People exist stacked atop each other. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
The final paper will go into the literature on the relationship between sight and sound in TV and movies; the presence of music affects both what people see and what they understand the music to mean, which sounds very much like what we’ve come to understand in law as transformativeness. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
In R. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
As a result, many people complain and want a "cash-only option": they want a contract for their water that comes with no such requirements. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
I suppose the only people that can answer that for most of those questions would be a jury of our peers. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:15 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:16 pm
Google filed its brief in the cross-appeal of the Oracle v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm
People have tried to divert and detract from the focus of our fight towards irrelevant claims and gossip. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am
Yet, in the case of The People v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 7:12 am
Housing need is not as simple as homeownership v renting, which is the only alternatives being pushed by our politicians. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:01 am
This week, a new comp decision came down from the courts (Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
See OFCCP v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
Lloyd v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
If any more people had turned up we would have been stacking up in the car park. [read post]
