Search for: "The People v. Harper" Results 401 - 420 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 11:04 pm
Marshalling primary sources, it reveals how the Supreme Court's opinion in Harper v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
It also means, however, that the AP sees the lead as the classic "heart of the work," (as in Harper & Row v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
  When selling a public good, however, it is best to acknowledge your allegiance to "the people. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
Harper & Row shifted the test. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:31 am
June Besek: How should we be weighing predictability v. nuanced analysis? [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Harper, No. 05-10247 "A conviction and defendants' sentences for conspiracy, drug possession, and weapons offenses are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) admitting testimonial hearsay; 2) excluding the conviction records of a critical state witness; 3) refusing to ask requested voir dire questions of the jury; 4) using a conviction in this case as a prior conviction for purposes of sentence enhancement; and 5) imposing an unreasonable sentence. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:45 am
Sean Harper SUFFOLK COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant's Lack of Insulin, Police's Use of Trickery Not So Unfair To Warrant Suppression of Statement People v. [read post]