Search for: "The Southwark"
Results 401 - 420
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Saviour in Southwark (1613), 10 Co. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
Reciprocity The underlying justification for those “well settled tests” was spelt out by Lord Millett in Southwark, when he explained (at p 20) that:“The governing principle is good neighbourliness, and this involves reciprocity. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
The Southwark coroner said he did not respect the assertion “that without the full address of the deceased the case cannot be covered,” as Press Gazette reports here. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm
Southwark LBC v Munu &Munu Mayors and City of London County Court 16 May 2012 Disrepair counterclaim. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
" See Southwark v Tanner [2001] 1 AC 1. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:48 pm
We have been onto their agents, saying get it sorted or we will report a 215 to Southwark council AND their owner clients who are paying them 10%. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
This had been approved in Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) [2009] UKHL 29.The Court of Appeal agreed with R.The 2004 Act has to be construed in the light of the provisions of the 1988 Act as regards assured shorthold tenancies, including section 5. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 3:09 am
We won’t have to wait long…the troughers will have their opportunity to argue their position – hopefully from the dock – on March 30th when they appear at Southwark Crown Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
It effectively raised the issue of oppression: The body of law upon which the argument is founded includes those cases raising the issue of "oppression": see, for example, Southwark L.B.C. v Sarfo (2000) 32 HLR 602 (where Roch LJ said, at 609, that "oppression may be very difficult if not impossible to define, but it is not difficult to recognise"); London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
This ignored the word 'his' is s.204(2) and was inconsistent with Barrett v Southwark LBC [2008] EWHC 1568 (QB) [our report here], where time was taken to run from the date the letter was received by the applicant, which was the day after the notification was received by her advisers. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
" See Southwark v Tanner [2001] 1 AC 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:27 pm
Southwark has 7 sq m for a single, 12 sq m for a double. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R v (on the application of Faarah v Southwark London Borough Council [2008] EWCA (Civ) 807 in the Court of Appeal (our note here) established that a policy could not stand if it could not be reconciled with the published scheme, not that a policy on the exercise of a discretion was unlawful. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
On the same day, the trial of the former cricketer Chris Cairns on a charge of perverting the course of justice in the libel case of Cairns v Modi will begin at the Southwark Crown before Sweeney J and a jury. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
I understand, for instance, that written submissions on this judgment were requested by the Court of Appeal in LB Southwark v Austin, in which we await the handing down of the CoA judgment. [read post]
