Search for: "The Southwark"
Results 401 - 420
of 471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 12:26 am
Word reaches us that LB Southwark v Austin (our report on the Court of Appeal here) has been given permission by the House of Lords (or Supreme Court as it will be). [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 1:17 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) House of Lords “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a right-to-buy claim should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay applied where the tenant's rent had been paid for him in the form of housing benefit. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:16 am
Hanoman v Southwark London Borough Council (No 2) [2009] UKHL 29; [2009] WLR (D) 181 “The requirement that a local authority which had delayed processing a ‘right to buy’ claim under Pt V of the Housing Act 1985 should deduct from the purchase price the purchasing tenant's rent payments during the period of delay remained applicable [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
Briefly, Mr Hanoman was a Southwark secure tenant. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:35 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council House of Lords “A local authority's children's services unit could not purport to fulfil its duties to look after a homeless child merely by referring him to the homeless persons unit. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
McConkey and another (Appellants) v The Simon Community (Respondents) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 24 (20 May 2009) Odelola (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 25 (20 May 2009) R (on the application of G) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondents) [2009] UKHL 26 (20 May 2009) Smith (Appellant) v [...] [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:03 am
The news has been updated for today on Family Lore Focus, including the House of Lords judgment in R (on the application of G) v London Borough of Southwark. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
Therefore the s.20 duty had arisen and Southwark could not side step it. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:50 am
The House of Lords has today given its judgment in the case of R (G) v Southwark [2009] UKHL 26. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
The DWP told Southwark, who then found he had been overpaid £1000 HB etc. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:44 am
Regina (Mendes and Another) v Southwark London Borough Council Court of Appeal “A judge needed to give reasons for preferring one side's arguments over the other on an application made by written submissions concerning costs. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:58 pm
Southwark acknowledged the notice was deficient but argued it should not be set aside just for that reason. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:14 am
We’ve been contacted by the solicitor for Mr Austin of Southwark v Austin. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:23 am
R (Mendes and another) v Southwark London Borough Council; [2009] WLR (D) 108 “A judge needed to give reasons for preferring one side's arguments over the other on an application for costs made by written submissions following the case being settled. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:07 am
Southwark had made an erroneous decision on Mr Mendes’ eligibility for housing assistance under Part VII. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:29 am
Southwark LBC are involved in two cases are being heard in the House of Lords next week. [read post]
A Former Independent Insurance Director is Ordered to Pay £1.28 Million or Face Further Imprisonment
10 Mar 2009, 2:16 am
On 3 November 2008, a confiscation order was made against Lomas for £470,113.On 25 February 2009, Condon was ordered to pay £1.28 million at a confiscation hearing at Southwark Crown Court. [read post]
