Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 401 - 420
of 23,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
The cases touched all of the major fields of intellectual property—two cases interpreted the federal trademark act (Jack Daniel’s and Abitron), one case involved patent enablement (Amgen), and one case explicated the federal copyright statutes (Goldsmith). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
The cases touched all of the major fields of intellectual property—two cases interpreted the federal trademark act (Jack Daniel’s and Abitron), one case involved patent enablement (Amgen), and one case explicated the federal copyright statutes (Goldsmith). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Based on my reading of lower court opinions, to date, courts in the Third Circuit also seem to follow the case-by-case approach. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:58 am
China copyrights with registration This said, there are good reasons for registering copyright in China in some cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:25 am
GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll The post SAD Scheme Cases Are Always Troubling–Betty’s Best v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:05 am
It has been a long and arduous journey for the “Cars for Kids” trademark infringement case spanning almost ten years and two appeals. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 8:34 am
by Dennis Crouch I previously wrote about the trademark case of Great Concepts v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:11 am
How do you think this case out? [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:21 am
Central to this case was the question of whether the Wavy Baby shoe—which is a “transformed” version of the iconic Vans Old Skool shoe—was a “work of artistic expression” entitled to heightened First Amendment protection rather than the traditional likelihood of confusion inquiry for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
But especially in a case of an alleged parody, that doesn’t answer the trademark use question. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation holds a hearing on President Biden’s AI policy; the White announces a proposed framework to allow government agencies to seize the patents of costly drugs that received government funding; and the social media company X characterizes a trademark infringement case against it as a “shakedown. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: the House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation holds a hearing on President Biden’s AI policy; the White announces a proposed framework to allow government agencies to seize the patents of costly drugs that received government funding; and the social media company X characterizes a trademark infringement case against it as a “shakedown. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:58 am
Sanofi is an important case, but it won’t transform patent law on its own. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:26 pm
The Vans case and appeal had both been stayed pending the outcome of Jack Daniel’s. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:23 am
I want to be clear here for a moment and point out a weak aspect of Trendily’s case. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 9:12 pm
The case arose over two decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) where all challenged claims of U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm
Office (USPTO) and Apple, Inc. file responses to his petition for writ of mandamus, the owner of the trademark APPLE JAZZ has filed a reply of his own charging that “the USPTO is not sincere and has never been sincere about deciding this case. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:15 pm
Office (USPTO) and Apple, Inc. file responses to his petition for writ of mandamus, the owner of the trademark APPLE JAZZ has filed a reply of his own charging that “the USPTO is not sincere and has never been sincere about deciding this case. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:13 am
Under Florida law, courts evaluate the enforceability of non-compete agreements based on Florida Statutes Section 542.335 as well as case law interpreting this statute. [read post]
