Search for: "U. S. v. Holder" Results 401 - 420 of 561
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am by Robert Chesney
” Id. at 271.The Court’s statement in Verdugo was an elaboration of its earlier language in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:01 pm by mstein03
[1] “Thailand and Russia balked at protecting U. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Another exclusivity provision originally included in FDAAA, but removed and later enacted as part of the QI Act, that is targeted to so-called “old” antibiotics (i.e., FDC Act § 505(v)) is not discussed in the GAO’s report, presumably because of the limited scope of the GAO report. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Kevin Johnson
Assuming that the 1996 amendments abrogate the Court’s holding in Rosenberg v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
Morgan and Orkney’s largest equity holder, rather than for the benefit of Orkney or Assured Guaranty. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:34 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  Comment b of that section explains that “[u]nder § 7.3 a senior mortgagee that discharges its mortgage of record and records a replacement mortgage does not lose its priority as against the holder of an intervening interest unless that holder suffers material prejudice. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:21 pm
  She's driving along the I-5, heading to Chula Vista to a birthday party with her kids, gets confused, is trying to find her exit, and wham, suddenly she sees the big "Mexico" sign and can't find a way to get over to the U-Turn lane. [read post]