Search for: "U. S. v. Stephen"
Results 401 - 420
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
The decision dated November 17, 2009 (2009 NY Slip Op 32745(U)), by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
(Stephen P. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:41 am
Contrary to Vinar's contention, the Lazer defendants are entitled to seek contribution or indemnification from him, as a subsequently retained attorney, to the extent his alleged negligence in settling the plaintiff's arbitration claims may have contributed to or aggravated her injuries (see Schauer v Joyce, 54 NY2d 1, 3-6; Alfaro v Schwartz, 233 AD2d 281, 281-282; Herkrath v Gaffin & Mayo, 192 AD2d 487, 488). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm
I asked Stephen Stine, Research Specialist at ABA's Legal Technology Resource Center, which administers the survey, to identify the behaviors that ABA wished to measure by means of these two questions, and to interpret the responses to the questions. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
Stephens, 2009 U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Bucaria in Rosenfeld v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court's decision in PARK'N FLY, INC. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Zak, 2009 NY Slip Op 31308(U) (Sup Ct Nassau County June 10, 2009), decided by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:50 am
Roberts Jr. and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
S. 353, 299 U. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
Irwin Eisenstein, Petitioner, v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:52 am
That is why today's case, Arizona v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Articles Andrew S. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
Dismissal after testing positive in random drug test later declared inoperative by the Appellate Division ruled lawfulMatter of Goldin v Kelly, 2009 NY Slip Op 30646(U), March 11, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 109751/08, Judge: Eileen A. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:28 am
Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:25 am
(Al-Marri v. [read post]
