Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 11:26 am
The Court upheld a favorable RICO decision of the Court of Appeals that permits injured workers to institute federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act(RICO) claims against employers, insurance carriers and defense medical experts. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm
"And, as the Federal Circuit Bar Association's brief makes clear, the move for Rader to recuse himself is widely opposed within the patent bar. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:41 pm
Because HIPAA Privacy Rule criminal violations are Class A Misdemeanors or felonies, Covered Entities and business associates should include HIPAA compliance in their Federal Sentencing Guideline Compliance Programs and practices and need to be concerned both about criminal exposure for their own direct violations, as well as imputed organizational liability for violations committed by their employees or agents under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, particularly where… [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:27 am
Patent No. 9,509,273 and U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
Walker (Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act; Federal Tort Claims Act) Corrales v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
(published at ¶93,642 in CCH's Federal Securities Law Reporter). [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
” The appeals court rejected this claim and “after reviewing historical and legal precedent,” concluded that “presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Donovan, and that is a different issue from the standing of the current petitioner.Suspension:The Board then suspended this proceeding pending the outcome of the federal court action, which action could be dispositive of, or have a bearing on, the issues in this proceeding.Deficient Fraud Claim: The Board then took the opportunity to review several of petitioner's claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Just over a year ago, the U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Lewis by amending its complaint, after denial of a motion to remand, to add new and distinct federal claims – thereby independently creating undisputed federal-question jurisdiction; and (2) whether a federal court's adjudication of the majority of a plaintiff's claims on summary judgment and dismissals with prejudice creates sufficient considerations of “finality, efficiency, and economy” to foreclose appellate review… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
Shoreline Towers Phase I Condominium Association, Inc., No. 09-11797, U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
The court held that the claim was barred by a provision of the FTCA, codified at 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
While the trial court rejected his motion, the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 6:40 am
Man sues Indiana Bar Examiners, challenging rule that excludes from admission anyone who “advocates the overthrow” of the U.S. government. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:41 am
Supreme Court marriage ruling Zimmerman lawyer apologizes for jest Judge rules Toronto police violated Charter in carding interaction but doesn’t exclude evidence US Supreme Court Raises Bar to Prove Job Discrimination Silvio Berlusconi found guilty of paying for sex with underage prostitute - Elysia Cherry, Legal Assistant Visit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 5:17 pm
Rahimi’s lawyers say a Supreme Court decision two years ago in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
What happens on federal habeas if the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
The court may adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a patent for his invention, as specified in any of his claims. . . . [read post]
